For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, asteroidsathome.net based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to expand his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for innovative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, bphomesteading.com a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of errors and akropolistravel.com hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.